Valhalla Editorial Note
We have been warning against the dangers of ingesting soy based substances after being made aware of the many problems since 2000, after reading numerous scientific articles stating the following type of information. So seventeen years later and still very few people in our society are even aware of this material. It has been asserted that soy is a few molecules away from being pure plastic. Soy is directly related to estrogen. Don’t take our word for it, have a look for yourself.
The molecules look identical through an electron microscope.
Of course estrogen is a stress hormone. It is our firm contention that soy based products do not belong anywhere near the food supply for the troubling reasons described below.
“The French Government also takes the soy risk seriously and is implementing new regulations that will require manufacturers to remove soy isoflavones from infant formula and soy foods targeted to children under 3 years old.”
“The idea that scientists could even consider soy for a cancer claim is ludicrous on the face of it. Soy isoflavones, the plant estrogens in soy most often credited with cancer prevention, are listed as ‘carcinogens’ in many toxicology and chemistry textbooks.”
As recorded by~Kaayla T. Daniel, PhD, CCN
An article published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (May 28, 2002;99(11):7616-7621) has raised new concerns about soy. Researchers injected mice with the soy isoflavones genistein and daidzein and then looked at the thymus gland.
I also have a recorded video that was taped in 2008 that has not been released as yet where I speak about how I see people all around me ingesting pure plastic in which they think is food. We explain in great detail how enormous chemical corporations have completely commandeered our current so called food supply. I go on and send warnings to those who will see, that our current food supply is laden with rubber, estrogen mimickers like soy, and the chemicals in what many feel is laundry soap. Even soap becomes part of our food supply when we are subjected to, or inhale these toxic chemicals.
What comes in through our nasal passages has a profound effect on our health. Through the nasal passages is where we actually first develop our individual immune systems.
Rubber remember? Over 10 years ago?
Or how about some plastic rice?
Unless and until the good people of this world begin to realize that we as the human family are being fundamentally changed through our dietary the health of this once great Nation will continue to deteriorate.
We are, the most of society, letting people feed and hydrate us that no nothing of proper human nutrition.
Know Thy Food.
This article appeared first at http://www.valhallafit.com
Phytoestrogens in Soy Depress Immune Function
Written by: Sally Fallon Morell
They found that the injections produced dose-responsive decreases in thymic weight of up to 80 percent. In other words, the more isoflavones given, the greater decrease in the weight of the thymus gland. The genistein-injected mice showed a large decrease in the number of immune cells and changes in the thymus, where immune cells mature. Genistein decreased thymocyte numbers up to 86 percent and doubled apoptosis (cell death), indicating that the mechanism of the genistein effect on loss of thymocytes is caused in part by increased apoptosis. In addition, genistein produced suppression of humoral immunity. Genistein injected at 8 mg/kg per day produced serum genistein levels comparable to those reported in soy-fed human infants, and this dose caused significant thymic and immune changes in mice.
Said the researchers: “Critically, dietary genistein at concentrations that produced serum genistein levels substantially less than those in soy-fed infants produced marked thymic atrophy. These results raise the possibility that serum genistein concentrations found in soy-fed infants may be capable of producing thymic and immune abnormalities, as suggested by previous reports of immune impairments in soy-fed human infants.”
These results explain the frequent infections, high fevers and autoimmune problems (including diabetes) that often occur in soy-fed children.
Unlike earlier reports on the negative effects of soy, this study was actually reported in a major newspaper. “A Closer Look at Soy and Babies” appeared in the Science section of the New York Times, May 21, 2002. The article quotes Dr. Paul S. Cook, head of the study, as stating that “parents whose babies did not need to drink soy formula for health reasons, like allergies, should consider using milk-based formula instead, if they do not breast feed.” Mead Johnson Nutritionals, maker of soy formula, naturally defended the use of soy formula. But this article represents the first hole in the media dike and yet another warning to parents to avoid soy formula for their babies.
This article appeared in Wise Traditions in Food, Farming and the Healing Arts, the quarterly magazine of the Weston A. Price Foundation, Summer 2002.
Sally Fallon Morell is the founding president of the Weston A. Price Foundation and founder of A Campaign for Real Milk. She is the author of the best-selling cookbook, Nourishing Traditions (with Mary G. Enig, PhD) and the Nourishing Traditions Book of Baby & Child Care (with Thomas S. Cowan, MD). She is also the author of Nourishing Broth (with Kaayla T. Daniel, PhD, CCN).
In a recent article titled, “Soy foods may not be all they’re cracked up to be.” Joseph G. Hattersley writes that Soy contains “potent enzyme inhibitors, which block trypsin needed for protein digestion causing enlargement of the pancreas and even cancer.” Health Freedom News by Nat Health Fed. 818 357-2181. Sept. 95 issue.
National Academy of Science